realme GT 7 Smartphone Review: Killer value with lots of AI features in the upper mid-range – NotebookCheck.net Reviews

realme GT 7 Smartphone Review: Killer value with lots of AI features in the upper mid-range – NotebookCheck.net Reviews

The realme GT 7 presents itself as a high-quality smartphone with IP69 certification, a huge 7,000 mAh battery, eSIM support and a versatile camera setup. 

The performance is very good, and the camera setup offers a wide range of options for an upper mid-range smartphone.

realme also provides the GT 7 with many AI functions, with the AI Planner feature standing out. 

We were unable to measure the advertised, spectacular brightness of the display during testing, but the panel is still accurate. 

Unfortunately, features such as wireless charging and 6 GHz Wi-Fi are not available.

Pros

+ high performance

+ IP69 certified

+ large battery

+ fast charging up to 120 W

+ 6 years of updates

Cons

USB 2.0 only

no wireless charging

6 GHz WLAN missing

The realme GT 7 can be purchased directly from Amazon, as it is only available in select European markets.

However, any warranty claims can be easily processed from Germany or other EU countries.

A 256 GB variant of the smartphone is available unlocked on Amazon US for $1,109.

Amazon Logo

$299.89

for Realme GT7 Pro GT 7 Pro RMX5010,RMX5011 6.78inch AMOLED LCD Display Touch Screen for Realme GT7 Pro Display Replacement

  • $11.99

    Ibywind 2 Pcs Screen Protector For Realme GT 7 Pro 5G 6.78″,Flexible TPU Film,With 1Pc Camera Lens Protector,1Pc Back Film,Bubble Free[Easy to install]

  • $7.99

    Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible for Realme GT 7 Pro Screen Protector Tempered Glass,Case Friendly High definition Anti Scratch 9H Hardness Compatible with Realme GT 7 Pro Screen Protector

The realme GT 7 is an upper mid-range version of the realme GT 7 Pro and is the successor to the realme GT 6. It’s positioning in this segment aims to impress with a particularly good price-performance ratio.

The GT 7 is available in two storage variants: 12/256 GB and 12/512 GB, which originally start at an RRP of €750 and €800, respectively but were already reduced by €100 at launch.

A Dream Edition model is also available that has been created in collaboration with the Aston Martin F1 team. 

The GT 7 Dream Edition is distinguished by more RAM, special accessories, an unusual color option, and costs €900.

Display

6.78 inch 19.79:9, 2780 x 1264 pixel 450 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, OLED, Rain Water Smart Touch, Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB 

, 482.7 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Proximity, eCompass, Gyroscope, OTG, IR-Blaster

Networking

Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.3 x 162.42 x 76.13 ( = 0.33 x 6.39 x 3 in)

Battery

7000 mAh Lithium-Ion, Silicon-Carbon-Anode

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 15

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix (Sony IMX906, 1/1.56″, f/1.8, OIS) + 50 MPix (2x opt. Zoom, Samsung S5KJN5, 1/2.8″, f/2.0) + 8 MPix (Ultra Wide, f/2.2); Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (Sony IMX615, 1/2.74″, f/2.4)

Additional features

Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: Onscreen, USB-Cabel (Type-A to Type-C), SIM-Tool, realme UI 6.0, 24 Months Warranty, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, atpX TWS+, LHDC, LDAC | GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1I, B1C, B2a, B2b), Galileo (E1, E5a, E5b), QZSS (L1, L5), NavIC (L5) | HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision | DRM Widevine L1 | eSIM | IP69 | Body-SAR: – W/kg, Head-SAR: – W/kg | max. charging speed: 120 W (wired), fanless, waterproof

Weight

206 g ( = 7.27 oz / 0.45 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

The realme GT 7 is available in IceSense Black and IceSense Blue color options. The frame is made of aluminum, the front is protected by Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, and the graphene back has a matte finish. 

The workmanship is of a good standard, although the gaps between the back and frame are not always completely even and the GT 7 creaks slightly when twisted. 

It is also both dust and waterproof in accordance with IP69 standards and can even withstand high-pressure and steam jet cleaning.

The USB port is only of the 2.0 specification, so there’s no DisplayPort-out supported. 

The infrared transmitter can come in handy for remote control of air conditioning systems, cameras, entertainment devices, and the like.

{element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_354345’).checked = false;document.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_353747’).forEach(element => {element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_353747’).checked = false;document.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_352690’).forEach(element => {element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_352690’).checked = false;document.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_344751’).forEach(element => {element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_344751’).checked = false;document.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_a6’).forEach(element => {element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_a6’).checked = false;return false;” title=”hide all”>❌

162.42 mm / 6.39 in 76.13 mm / 3 in 8.3 mm / 0.3268 in 206 g0.4542 lbs160.8 mm / 6.33 in 76.1 mm / 3 in 8.1 mm / 0.3189 in 205 g0.4519 lbs160.26 mm / 6.31 in 74.95 mm / 2.95 in 8.39 mm / 0.3303 in 212 g0.4674 lbs146.9 mm / 5.78 in 70.5 mm / 2.78 in 7.2 mm / 0.2835 in 162 g0.3571 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

In combination with our Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 reference router, the realme GT 7 offers fast Wi-Fi throughput and delivers stable transfer rates. However, despite Wi-Fi 7 support, the 6 GHz band is not supported.

The GT 7’s cellular reception is good in the city and we had no problems in the suburbs either. The voice quality of the smartphone is good when held to the ear, but ambient noise filtering is only moderate. 

In addition to two nano-SIM cards, the GT 7 can also use an eSIM instead of the second physical SIM.

For biometric security, an optical fingerprint sensor is integrated into the display, which offers fast recognition and quickly unlocks the smartphone. 

Face recognition is also available via the front camera, although this quickly reaches its limits in the dark and is less secure.

The Rain-Water-Smart-Touch function is practical and effectively prevents incorrect entries on the touchscreen due to water.

Networking
Realme GT 7
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000





976 (min: 936) MBit/s ∼92%

iperf3 receive AXE11000





939 (min: 926) MBit/s ∼80%

Samsung Galaxy S25
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000





1058 (min: 518) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 receive AXE11000





1167 (min: 1006) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz





1210 (min: 998) MBit/s ∼88%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz





1201 (min: 1184) MBit/s ∼81%

Honor 400 Pro
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000





958 (min: 874) MBit/s ∼91%

iperf3 receive AXE11000





810 (min: 771) MBit/s ∼69%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz





1238 (min: 936) MBit/s ∼90%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz





1483 (min: 1349) MBit/s ∼100%

Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000





987 (min: 506) MBit/s ∼93%

iperf3 receive AXE11000





863 (min: 749) MBit/s ∼74%

Global Average -3
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000






979 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼93%

iperf3 receive AXE11000






1061 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼91%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz






1363 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼99%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz






1455 (min: 390) MBit/s ∼98%

Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000






724 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼68%

iperf3 receive AXE11000






733 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼63%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz






1382 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz






1393 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼94%

0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000Tooltip

Realme GT 7  ; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø976 (936-1000)

Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø971 (506-1017)

Realme GT 7  ; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø937 (926-953)

Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø862 (749-919)

The realme GT 7 comes with realme UI 6.0 layered on top of Google’s Android 15. According to the manufacturer, the GT 7 is eligible for four years of major updates and six years of security patches. 

Numerous AI tools are included, which allow speech and text to be summarized, text creation, and the gaming experience. Additionally, realme also focuses on image post-processing. 

However, the real highlight is the AI Planner feature that can filter out appointments from documents, emails or images, and enter them directly into calendars.

When it comes to sustainability, however, realme is reluctant to make any concrete statements. 

The outer packaging is plastic-free. Instructions for repairs or spare parts for customers are not offered.

Selfie with the realme GT 7 (portrait mode)
Selfie with the realme GT 7

The front camera has a high 32 MP resolution but does not use pixel binning, which is particularly noticeable when taking pictures in low light. The details look a little artificial at full size, but otherwise the realme GT 7 takes very appealing selfies. Videos can be recorded in 4K Ultra HD 60 fps.

The triple camera on the back includes two 50 MP sensors, but the zoom has to make do without optical image stabilization (OIS). It still delivers decent results in the digital zoom range up to 100x. 

The main camera produces very high-contrast images and overdoes it with saturation, especially in dark green tones. The ultra-wide angle lens is of a low 8 MP resolution but surprises with decent results.

Videos can be recorded at a maximum of 8K 30 fps, though Ultra HD videos can go even up to 120 FPS.

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main CameraMain CameraUltra-wide angle5x ZoomLow light

orginal image

click to load images

ColorChecker

16.2 ∆E

12 ∆E

19.3 ∆E

18.4 ∆E

16 ∆E

11.3 ∆E

12.4 ∆E

13 ∆E

11.5 ∆E

15.3 ∆E

10.7 ∆E

9.7 ∆E

11.6 ∆E

20 ∆E

7 ∆E

9.3 ∆E

10.7 ∆E

15.3 ∆E

8.8 ∆E

9.6 ∆E

13.6 ∆E

22.3 ∆E

18.6 ∆E

12.8 ∆E

ColorChecker Realme GT 7: 13.55 ∆E min: 6.98 – max: 22.3 ∆E
ColorChecker

19.4 ∆E

20.4 ∆E

23.1 ∆E

22.7 ∆E

25.6 ∆E

31.6 ∆E

20.5 ∆E

16 ∆E

14.3 ∆E

19.6 ∆E

25.4 ∆E

28.7 ∆E

17.2 ∆E

25.8 ∆E

10 ∆E

18.6 ∆E

19 ∆E

27.6 ∆E

16.9 ∆E

17.1 ∆E

26.5 ∆E

28.3 ∆E

21.6 ∆E

13.5 ∆E

ColorChecker Realme GT 7: 21.23 ∆E min: 10.01 – max: 31.61 ∆E
Subpixel matrix
Subpixel matrix

The 6.78-inch OLED panel of the realme GT 7 is evenly illuminated, offers a high level of detail, and is an accurate color display. 

The manufacturer promises brightness levels of up to 6,000 cd/m², but we could not confirm the same in our measurements. With a pure white display, we achieved an average of 1,530 cd/m² in our measurement. It doesn’t get any brighter with a reduced white area (APL18) or HDR playback.

We measure the peak brightness via a measurement field in the developer options, but even here it stops at 2,746 cd/m².

The OLED flickers at a relatively low base frequency of 90 Hz, but realme also uses high-frequency PWM dimming, which should reduce the impact on sensitive users.

1513
cd/m²
1529
cd/m²
1561
cd/m²
1512
cd/m²
1519
cd/m²
1544
cd/m²
1515
cd/m²
1516
cd/m²
1557
cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1561 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1529.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.93 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 1519 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.83
ΔE Greyscale 1.1 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
98.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22

Realme GT 7
OLED, 2780×1264, 6.8″
Samsung Galaxy S25
AMOLED, 2340×1080, 6.2″
Honor 400 Pro
AMOLED, 2800×1280, 6.7″
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Flow AMOLED, 3200×1440, 6.7″
Screen

-84%

-15%

-27%

Brightness middle

1519

1301

-14%

1535

1%

1846

22%

Brightness

1530

1311

-14%

1531

0%

1850

21%

Brightness Distribution

97

98

1%

99

2%

93

-4%

Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *

1

3.1

-210%

1.1

-10%

1.2

-20%

Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *

1.7

4.4

-159%

2.2

-29%

2.9

-71%

Greyscale dE 2000 *

1.1

2.3

-109%

1.7

-55%

2.3

-109%

Gamma

2.22 99%

2.01 109%

2.29 96%

2.25 98%

CCT

6661 98%

6454 101%

6511 100%

6707 97%

* … smaller is better

Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Honor 400 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Honor 400 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession – a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected 90 Hz
Amplitude: 16.76 %
Secondary Frequency: 2083 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 90 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 90 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8350 (minimum: 5 – maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

       Response Time Black to White
1.23 ms … rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined ↗ 0.578 ms rise
↘ 0.647 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.96 ms … rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined ↗ 0.5155 ms rise
↘ 0.4465 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms).

The realme GT 7 is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 9400e. The SoC offers high performance in all areas and the system speed is very high in everyday use.

The surface temperatures rise sharply in the 3DMark stress test and climb just above the 48 °C mark in places. This is high but not critical. The SoC remains stable in most stress tests, but throttles slightly in the more demanding ones.

The GT 7’s two speakers deliver a good sound experience, but high tones sometimes distort a little at maximum volume. Bluetooth codec support is decent, but there’s no LC3 or Auracast support.

With its 7,000 mAh battery battery, the smartphone is ideally equipped for long runtimes. These are at a very good level, but even longer run times would certainly have been possible with higher efficiency. 

The GT 7 can be charged with a 120 W power adapter. Unfortunately, this was not available to us for testing.

Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


3087 Points +36%

Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


2959 Points +31%

Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


2309 Points +2%

Realme GT 7
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288


2265 Points

Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400e
  (n=1)





2265 Points 0%

Honor 400 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288


2031 Points -10%

Average of class Smartphone
  (196 – 3479, n=205, last 2 years)





1605 Points -29%

Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


9776 Points +31%

Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


8711 Points +17%

Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


8154 Points +10%

Realme GT 7
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288


7439 Points

Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400e
  (n=1)





7439 Points 0%

Honor 400 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288


6042 Points -19%

Average of class Smartphone
  (830 – 10401, n=205, last 2 years)





4624 Points -38%

PCMark for Android – Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


20623 Points +56%

Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


19622 Points +48%

Honor 400 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288


17359 Points +31%

Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 – 27169, n=193, last 2 years)





14289 Points +8%

Realme GT 7
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288


13240 Points

Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400e
  (n=1)





13240 Points 0%

3DMark
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


27327 Points +48%

Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


22957 Points +24%

Realme GT 7
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288


18461 Points

Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400e
  (n=1)





18461 Points 0%

Honor 400 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288


16971 Points -8%

Average of class Smartphone
  (271 – 27493, n=188, last 2 years)





9626 Points -48%

Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


6854 Points +29%

Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


5907 Points +11%

Realme GT 7
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288


5300 Points

Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400e
  (n=1)





5300 Points 0%

Honor 400 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288


4593 Points -13%

Average of class Smartphone
  (61 – 7094, n=193, last 2 years)





2599 Points -51%

Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


6932 Points +27%

Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


6036 Points +10%

Realme GT 7
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288


5466 Points

Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400e
  (n=1)





5466 Points 0%

Honor 400 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288


4552 Points -17%

Average of class Smartphone
  (62 – 7212, n=192, last 2 years)





2588 Points -53%

Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


11687 Points +39%

Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


11553 Points +37%

Realme GT 7
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288


8407 Points

Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400e
  (n=1)





8407 Points 0%

Average of class Smartphone
  (2799 – 13318, n=82, last 2 years)





8044 Points -4%

Honor 400 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288


7395 Points -12%

Solar Bay Score
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


11765 Points +44%

Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


11251 Points +38%

Realme GT 7
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288


8165 Points

Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400e
  (n=1)





8165 Points 0%

Average of class Smartphone
  (3223 – 13244, n=82, last 2 years)





7971 Points -2%

Honor 400 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288


7461 Points -9%

GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Honor 400 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288


121 fps +102%

Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


120 fps +100%

Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


120 fps +100%

Realme GT 7
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288


60 fps

Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400e
  (n=1)





60 fps 0%

Average of class Smartphone
  (5.5 – 166, n=202, last 2 years)





56 fps -7%

1920×1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


279 fps +18%

Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


248 fps +5%

Realme GT 7
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288


236 fps

Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400e
  (n=1)





236 fps 0%

Honor 400 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288


189 fps -20%

Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 – 332, n=202, last 2 years)





104.4 fps -56%

on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


120 fps +100%

Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


88 fps +47%

Honor 400 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288


86 fps +43%

Realme GT 7
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288


60 fps

Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400e
  (n=1)





60 fps 0%

Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 – 144, n=203, last 2 years)





44.4 fps -26%

2560×1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


118 fps +26%

Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


94 fps 0%

Realme GT 7
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288


94 fps

Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400e
  (n=1)





94 fps 0%

Honor 400 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288


80 fps -15%

Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 – 129, n=202, last 2 years)





41 fps -56%

3840×2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


52 fps +24%

Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


43 fps +2%

Realme GT 7
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288


42 fps

Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400e
  (n=1)





42 fps 0%

Honor 400 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288


37 fps -12%

Average of class Smartphone
  (0.54 – 53, n=203, last 2 years)





19.1 fps -55%

Octane V2 – Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


95809 Points +108%

Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


94853 Points +105%

Realme GT 7
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288


46162 Points

Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400e
  (n=1)





46162 Points 0%

Average of class Smartphone
  (2228 – 100368, n=205, last 2 years)





44427 Points -4%

Honor 400 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288


39175 Points -15%

Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Honor 400 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288


2472 Points +104%

Realme GT 7
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288


1214 Points

Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400e
  (n=1)





1214 Points 0%

Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


650 Points -46%

Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


633 Points -48%

Average of class Smartphone
  (51 – 2472, n=55, last 2 years)





508 Points -58%

Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Realme GT 7
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288


5158 Points

Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400e
  (n=1)





5158 Points 0%

Honor 400 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288


2460 Points -52%

Average of class Smartphone
  (51 – 9453, n=55, last 2 years)





1148 Points -78%

Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


647 Points -87%

Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


619 Points -88%

Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Realme GT 7
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288


4903 Points

Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400e
  (n=1)





4903 Points 0%

Honor 400 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288


3667 Points -25%

Average of class Smartphone
  (123 – 13084, n=55, last 2 years)





1868 Points -62%

Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


1448 Points -70%

Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


1298 Points -74%

Jetstream 2 – 2.0 Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


243.318 Points +68%

Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


235.734 Points +63%

Realme GT 7
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288


144.405 Points

Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400e
  (n=1)





144.4 Points 0%

Average of class Smartphone
  (13.8 – 387, n=159, last 2 years)





140.5 Points -3%

Honor 400 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288


107.55 Points -26%

  46.8 °C
116 F
47.3 °C
117 F
46.8 °C
116 F
 
  47 °C
117 F
47.1 °C
117 F
46.5 °C
116 F
 
  45.6 °C
114 F
46.6 °C
116 F
44.8 °C
113 F
 
Maximum: 47.3 °C = 117 F
Average: 46.5 °C = 116 F
47.3 °C
117 F
47.8 °C
118 F
48 °C
118 F
47.1 °C
117 F
48 °C
118 F
48.3 °C
119 F
44.4 °C
112 F
46.9 °C
116 F
46 °C
115 F
Maximum: 48.3 °C = 119 F
Average: 47.1 °C = 117 F

Room Temperature 22 °C = 72 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 46.5 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.3 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.3 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


99.5 %

Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


64.6 % -35%

Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


52.7 % -47%

Honor 400 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


42.7 % -57%

Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


99.3 %

Honor 400 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


74 % -25%

Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


70.8 % -29%

Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


99.1 %

Honor 400 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


75.8 % -24%

Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


74.5 % -25%

Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


54.1 % -45%

Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Honor 400 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


73.8 % +12%

Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


70.1 % +6%

Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


65.9 %

Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


47.5 % -28%

0102030405060708090100110120130140Tooltip

Realme GT 7 Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø64.5 (64.3-64.7)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø92.8 (76.2-144.6)

Honor 400 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø50.4 (38.6-90.4)

Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø99.3 (82.3-127.5)

Realme GT 7 Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø9.85 (9.82-9.89)

Honor 400 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø9.7 (8.23-11.1)

Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø13.8 (12.2-17.3)

Realme GT 7 Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø20.1 (20-20.2)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø24.2 (20.2-37.3)

Honor 400 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø22.3 (19.1-25.2)

Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø28.1 (24.9-33.4)

Realme GT 7 Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø22.1 (21-31.9)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø25 (19.3-40.6)

Honor 400 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø24.1 (20.3-27.4)

Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø27.8 (25.4-36.2)

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.841.42530.1343126.734.54027.838.25035.939.66328.343.38028.839.510027.340.812517.247.416016.351.620014.752.425012.857.931513.259.940012.66050012.365.863012.269.280012.170.5100012.375.8125012.378.3160012.179.220001281.5250012.279.731501382.7400013.182.9500013.180.4630013.580.2800013.478.61000013.477.31250013.574.21600013.363.9SPL2591.6N0.687.3median 13.1median 75.8Delta1.79.338.239.332.533.221.92931.425.333.531.421.725.22424.317.828.716.638.419.753.61956.117.558.116.257.416.557.712.366.412.369.21572.613.275.612.475.811.676.713.380.31280.712.781.612.980.413.3781376.413.174.313.569.913.670.713.46425.489.90.778.3median 13.3median 72.61.710hearing rangehide median Pink Noise

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 137) 23h 45min

The realme GT 7 offers a powerful overall package with many AI functions and a huge battery that you would not expect in a smartphone of this size.

The camera setup is decent, but also shows a few shortcomings in the test. However, it is difficult to find anything comparable in this price range.

Realme GT 7
– 06/27/2025 v8

Daniel Schmidt

Connectivity

43 / 69 → 63%

Games Performance

43 / 55 → 78%

Application Performance

69 / 85 → 81%

Smartphone – Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
25%

Packaging
95%

Power Use
96.8%

Repairability
40%

Software Updates
89%

Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 57.6%

Image

Model / Review

Price

Weight

Drive

Display

1.

83.2%

Realme GT 7

Realme GT 7
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e ⎘
ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $299.89
for Realme GT7 Pro GT 7 Pro …
2. $11.99
Ibywind 2 Pcs Screen Protect…
3. $7.99
Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible …
206 g 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash 6.78″
2780×1264
450 PPI
OLED

2.

88.9%

Samsung Galaxy S25

Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. 
OtterBox Samsung Galaxy S25 …
2. $7.98
firtstnow 3 Pack Glass Scree…
3. $18.99
Super Fast Charger Type C, 2…
List Price: 899€
162 g 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash 6.20″
2340×1080
416 PPI
AMOLED

3.

82.5%

Honor 400 Pro

Honor 400 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $11.32
HGJTFANY [5 Pcs Screen Prote…
2. $7.87
FZZSZS (4-Pack for Honor 400…
3. $6.88
Damolong Screen Protector Co…
List Price: 800€
205 g 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash 6.70″
2800×1280
460 PPI
AMOLED

4.

85.3%

Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra

Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $7.99
Suttkue for Xiaomi Poco F7 P…
2. $10.19
Ibywind For Xiaomi Poco F7 U…
3. $7.59
Anoowkoa 2 Pack for Xiaomi P…
List Price: 800€
212 g 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash 6.67″
3200×1440
526 PPI
Flow AMOLED

More articles related to this device

Realme GT 7 (GT7 Series)

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Daniel Schmidt, 2025-07- 9 (Update: 2025-07- 9)

Read More

Prev post
Next post

Leave A Reply

en_USEnglish