A paper by King’s College London scientists suggests that space-based solar panels (SBSP) could cut Europe’s land-based renewable energy needs by up to 80%, including reducing battery energy storage usage by more than 70%. The authors are now in contact with leading companies such as Space Solar.
Blathnaid O’Dea
A group of scientists from King’s College London analyzed the potential of SBSP using designs based on NASA’s cost and performance projections for 2050.
Their analysis used a near-baseload, low technology readiness level (TRL) design incorporating mirror-like reflectors, or heliostats, which direct sunlight to a single concentrator, enabling nearly 99.7% annual power availability.
The study found that this SBSP design can cut total systems costs by 7% to 15%, offset up to 80% of wind and solar, and reduce battery usage by over 70% (although they noted that hydrogen remains important for seasonal balancing).
Their study, “Assess space-based solar power for European-scale power system decarbonization,” was published in the scientific journal Joule in August 2025.
“SBSP can provide nearly continuous renewable generation and cover a wide range of areas when deployed in space. As we show in the paper, its role varies significantly depending on system scale,” Dr. Wei He, corresponding author and senior lecturer at King’s College London’s Department of Engineering, told pv magazine.
The King’s College researchers claim their study is the first to explore how beneficial SBSP could be for European grids and that it is the first to provide a cost estimation of using this technology in the European market.

 and the planar design (RD2) annual fixed cost on optimized energy storage capacity in 2050.</p>
<p>” data-medium-file=”https://www.pv-magazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/fig-5-schematic-from-KCL-energy-storage-600×278.jpg” data-large-file=”https://www.pv-magazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/fig-5-schematic-from-KCL-energy-storage-1200×555.jpg” tabindex=”0″ role=”button” src=”https://www.pv-magazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/fig-5-schematic-from-KCL-energy-storage-600×278.jpg” alt width=”600″ height=”278″ ><figcaption>Impact of the heliostat design (RD1) and the planar design (RD2) annual fixed cost on optimized energy storage capacity in 2050. </p>
<p><i>Image: Xinyang Che,Lijun Liu,Wei He, Joule 2025, published by Elsevier Inc.</i></p>
</figcaption></figure>
<p>While the paper acknowledged the potential for SBSP to assist Europe in achieving its net-zero target by 2050, the authors added that the feasibility of the technology is still under review.</p>
<p>Besides the lower TRL design which yielded compelling results, the scientists also looked at another design – also based on NASA’s 2050 projections. This was a partially intermittent, higher TRL planar design, which emerged as less cost-competitive than the first option. It would need additional cost reductions to compete with both the heliostat design and terrestrial renewables, according to the study.</p>
<p>The first engineering design for a solar power satellite was produced by NASA engineer Peter Glaser in 1968. Widespread deployment of SBSP has been limited due to issues such as its high upfront capital costs, orbital debris risk, beam safety regulation, and public acceptance of kilometer-scale receiving stations based on Earth.</p>
<p>However, recent technological milestones such as multi-junction and lightweight photovoltaic cells achieving near 47% efficiency, and the fact that modular in-orbit assembly, and successful wireless power demonstrations have all reached mid-range TRLs suggest SBSP may evolve “from a niche concept to a technically viable solution by the 2030s,” stated the paper.</p>
<p>The paper added that the costs associated with launching these systems have significantly reduced due to reusable launch vehicles and that advances in system design have further strengthened the technical foundations of SBSP.</p>
<p>While in-orbit manufacturing obstacles and policy frameworks remain, major space agencies are “actively shaping regulatory pathways, motivating the need to understand SBSP’s potential contribution to net-zero goals,” the paper observed.</p>
<figure id=)

