Xiaomi 15S Pro review: Newfound independence and strong battery life in a flagship smartphone – NotebookCheck.net Reviews

Xiaomi 15S Pro review: Newfound independence and strong battery life in a flagship smartphone – NotebookCheck.net Reviews

The Xiaomi 15S Pro offers a similarly strong overall package as the Pro model. This is hardly surprising, as everything apart from the chipset remains the same. In its effort to become more independent and to offer all components in-house, Xiaomi is on a very promising path with its XRing O1. Considering Google’s work with its Tensor series, Xiaomi’s SoC debut is genuinely remarkable. While the 15S Pro with the XRing O1 is slightly less powerful than the 15 Pro with the Snapdragon 8 Elite, it offers more consistent performance overall.

Anyone willing to accept compromises in update support and availability will get a great smartphone with solid hardware. However, we see no clear reason to choose the 15S Pro over the Xiaomi 15 Pro.

Pros

+ long battery life

+ premium look and feel

+ powerful SoC

+ fast charging

+ bright 1,440p display

Cons

limited availability (no eSIM etc.)

no guaranteed software updates

high thermal output

The Xiaomi 15S Pro is currently available exclusively on the Chinese market. The standard configuration, which includes 16 GB of LPDDR5T RAM and 512 GB of UFS 4.1 storage, is priced at ¥5,499 (approximately €680 or $765 USD).

At our loan partner Trading Shenzhen, prices start at around €700, or roughly $820 USD. It remains unclear whether this new flagship phone will be officially released in Europe or the United States.

Amazon Logo

$7.99

Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible with Xiaomi 15S Pro Screen Protector Tempered Glass, Case Friendly [Hardness 9H ][High definition] [Anti Scratch]

  • $16.79

    Bruni Screen Protector compatible with Xiaomi 15S Pro Protector Film, crystal clear Protective Film (2X)

  • $10.32

    HGJTFANY [4 Pcs Screen Protector for Xiaomi 15S Pro (6.73 Inch), 9H Hardness Tempered Glass Screen Film, Highly Clear, Anti-Scratch, Bubble Free, for Xiaomi 15S Pro Protective Film

The Xiaomi 15S Pro is a new variant of the existing Pro model, but aside from the new processor and an optional carbon look, it remains largely unchanged. According to Xiaomi, the textured surface is intended to resemble dragon scales, or at least that is what the name implies. While the 15 Pro is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, the S version in the 15 series uses Xiaomi’s own XRing O1 chip.

Display

6.73 inch 20:9, 3200 x 1440 pixel 521 PPI, capacitive Touchscreen, LTPO, 1920Hz PWM, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash, 512 GB 

, 479 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer, UWB, OTG, Miracast

Networking

802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, 5G:n1 / n2 / n3 / n5 / n7 / n8 / n12 / n20 / n26 / n28 / n38 / n40 / n41 / n48 / n66 / n77 / n78 / n79; 4G:FDD-LTE:B1 / B2 / B3 / B4 / B5 / B7 / B8 / B12 / B17 / B18 / B19 / B20 / B26 / B28 / B66 TDD-LTE:B34 / B38 / B39 / B40 / B41 / B42 / B48; 3G: B1 / B2 / B4 / B5 / B6 / B8 / B19; 2G:B2 / B3 / B5 / B8, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.3 x 161.3 x 75.3 ( = 0.33 x 6.35 x 2.96 in)

Battery

6100 mAh Silicon-Carbon

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 15

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.4, 23 mm, 1/1.31″, OIS) + 50 MPix (f/2.5, 120 m, telephoto, OIS, 5x optical zoom) + 50 MPix (f/2.2, 14 mm, ultrawide)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.0, 22 mm)

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, charger, case, USB cable, HyperOS 2, 12 Months Warranty, widevine L1, IP68; GPS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (G1), Galileo (E1, E5a), Beidou (B1, B1c, B2a), QZSS (L1, L5), fanless, waterproof

Weight

216 g ( = 7.62 oz / 0.48 pounds), Power Supply: 104 g ( = 3.67 oz / 0.23 pounds)

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

Colour selection of the Xiaomi 15S Pro
Colour selection of the Xiaomi 15S Pro

The design and dimensions of the Xiaomi 15S Pro are identical to those of the standard Pro model. It features a water-resistant chassis rated to the IP68 standard. High-quality materials and excellent build precision give this premium smartphone a refined and sophisticated feel. With a screen-to-body ratio of 90 percent, the 15S Pro also makes efficient use of its front surface area.

The matte finish on the back helps minimise visible fingerprints. Xiaomi uses Dragon Crystal Glass, and the aluminium frame transitions seamlessly into the glass body. In the hand, the 15S Pro feels exceptionally cohesive and well balanced.

{element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_347687’).checked = false;document.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_344700’).forEach(element => {element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_344700’).checked = false;document.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_353839’).forEach(element => {element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_353839’).checked = false;document.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_344752’).forEach(element => {element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_344752’).checked = false;document.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_343671’).forEach(element => {element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_343671’).checked = false;document.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_a6’).forEach(element => {element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_a6’).checked = false;return false;” title=”hide all”>❌

162.3 mm / 6.39 in 76.7 mm / 3.02 in 8.2 mm / 0.3228 in 215 g0.474 lbs161.3 mm / 6.35 in 75.3 mm / 2.96 in 8.7 mm / 0.3425 in 213 g0.4696 lbs161.3 mm / 6.35 in 75.3 mm / 2.96 in 8.3 mm / 0.3268 in 216 g0.4762 lbs158.4 mm / 6.24 in 75.8 mm / 2.98 in 7.3 mm / 0.2874 in 190 g0.4189 lbs152.8 mm / 6.02 in 72 mm / 2.83 in 8.5 mm / 0.3346 in 199 g0.4387 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

The Xiaomi smartphone offers a well-rounded feature set including USB OTG, Bluetooth 5.4, NFC, an infrared blaster, and a UWB chip. It also includes a high-speed USB port with 3.2 Gen 2 specification, which supports wired video output. According to the manufacturer, sensitive data such as biometric information and passwords are protected by a dedicated in-house security chip built into the device.

The Xiaomi 15S Pro ships with the second-generation HyperOS and comes with Play Protect certification. Xiaomi remains vague about software update policies for the Chinese market. At the time of testing, the device was running security patches from May 2025.

As is typical for the manufacturer’s Chinese models, Google services are not supported out of the box. Instead, Xiaomi’s own ecosystem and local Chinese services are used.

However, Google frameworks are preinstalled, meaning users only need to install the Play Store manually via Xiaomi’s app store. The system language can be set to Chinese or English. A German language pack is not available, which may be a drawback for German-speaking users considering an import.

The packaging of the Xiaomi 15S Pro is made of cardboard, and the device itself is wrapped in paper. Xiaomi does not provide detailed information about the materials used or their recycling rates, but the company states that it is increasing the use of recycled materials across all its smartphones.

Although the 15S Pro is unlikely to see a global release, it offers broad support for both 5G and 4G mobile network bands. All frequency bands relevant for German-speaking regions are supported, making the device viable for import.

Equipped with Wi-Fi 7, the Xiaomi smartphone achieves peak transfer speeds of up to 1,800 Mbps when tested with the Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 router. This is made possible by the device’s ability to operate in the 6 GHz band. However, upload speeds during testing were noticeably lower.

Networking
Xiaomi 15S Pro
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz





508 (min: 412) MBit/s ∼28%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz





1524 (min: 1222) MBit/s ∼95%

Xiaomi 15 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz





816 (min: 564) MBit/s ∼45%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz





1520 (min: 1364) MBit/s ∼94%

Samsung Galaxy S25+
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000





1094 (min: 655) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 receive AXE11000





1154 (min: 1048) MBit/s ∼99%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz





1311 (min: 984) MBit/s ∼72%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz





1204 (min: 1187) MBit/s ∼75%

Oppo Find X8 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz





563 (min: 494) MBit/s ∼31%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz





1610 (min: 1480) MBit/s ∼100%

Google Pixel 9 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000





955 (min: 858) MBit/s ∼87%

iperf3 receive AXE11000





795 (min: 680) MBit/s ∼68%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz





1830 (min: 1666) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz





1602 (min: 1387) MBit/s ∼100%

Average 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000






966 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼88%

iperf3 receive AXE11000






1167 (min: 810) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz






1283 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼70%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz






1441 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼90%

Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000






727 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼66%

iperf3 receive AXE11000






733 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼63%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz






1383 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼76%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz






1388 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼86%

050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700175018001850Tooltip

Xiaomi 15S Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø508 (412-574)

Google Pixel 9 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1830 (1666-1889)

Xiaomi 15S Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1524 (1222-1653)

Google Pixel 9 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1601 (1387-1829)

Google Pixel 9 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø955 (858-990)

Google Pixel 9 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø794 (680-916)

To assess real-world positioning accuracy, we recorded a short cycling route for comparison using the Garmin Venu 2. The route data from the Xiaomi smartphone shows some minor deviations in detail but overall provides accurate location tracking.

Thanks to dual band support for satellite systems, positioning is both highly precise with accuracy around two metres and very quick.

The Xiaomi 15S Pro is equipped with four microphones and supports two physical nano SIM cards. eSIM functionality is not available in the Chinese version. However, the device does support VoLTE and calls over domestic Wi-Fi networks.

Voice quality is good, with voices reproduced clearly and at an adequate volume.

Selfie with the Xiaomi 15S Pro
Selfie with the Xiaomi 15S Pro

The rear-facing triple camera setup with Leica branding remains unchanged from the Pro model . The 50 MP main camera uses a 1/1.31-inch sensor and features optical image stabilisation. It delivers strong detail and very fast capture performance. However, colour accuracy shows occasional deviations, which may disappoint at this price point.

The Leica periscope lens offers a 50 MP resolution with OIS, enabling 5x lossless zoom and maintaining good sharpness even at up to 10x magnification. The 14 mm ultra-wide-angle camera is somewhat less convincing, though overall image quality remains acceptable for the price bracket.

For video recording, both Dolby Vision and HDR10+ are supported. Footage can be captured in 8K at 30 frames per second, or in UHD at up to 60 frames per second.

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraHauptkameraLow LightUltraweitwinkel

orginal image

click to load images

ColorChecker

12.2 ∆E

15.2 ∆E

23.2 ∆E

19.8 ∆E

20 ∆E

14.4 ∆E

9 ∆E

11.4 ∆E

14.1 ∆E

3.2 ∆E

13.6 ∆E

9 ∆E

4.6 ∆E

13.3 ∆E

5.3 ∆E

7.6 ∆E

9.3 ∆E

16.2 ∆E

5.3 ∆E

9.2 ∆E

15 ∆E

10.9 ∆E

4.2 ∆E

10.5 ∆E

ColorChecker Xiaomi 15S Pro: 11.52 ∆E min: 3.2 – max: 23.21 ∆E
ColorChecker

21.3 ∆E

17.5 ∆E

23.6 ∆E

21 ∆E

27.7 ∆E

22.4 ∆E

21.8 ∆E

18.5 ∆E

17 ∆E

19.6 ∆E

16.7 ∆E

23.2 ∆E

18.1 ∆E

19.2 ∆E

13.6 ∆E

10.7 ∆E

19.6 ∆E

23.2 ∆E

20.1 ∆E

15.8 ∆E

14.8 ∆E

22.3 ∆E

18.8 ∆E

12.8 ∆E

ColorChecker Xiaomi 15S Pro: 19.14 ∆E min: 10.72 – max: 27.66 ∆E
Xiaomi 15S Pro power adapter
Xiaomi 15S Pro power adapter

The box includes a 90-watt fast charger, a protective case and a USB cable. A screen protector is also pre-applied. Our review sample from Trading Shenzhen additionally came with an EU power adapter and a USB OTG adapter, extending the standard contents for the Chinese version.

The imported device comes with a 12-month warranty. This applies specifically to our review unit sourced from Trading Shenzhen and may differ depending on the country of purchase. In the event of a warranty claim, returns can be sent to a German shipping address provided by the retailer.

Inputs on the OLED display are registered quickly and precisely, even at the edges of the touchscreen. The manufacturer specifies a touch sampling rate of up to 300 Hz. The 15S Pro offers smooth handling throughout, and the X-axis vibration motor provides crisp haptic feedback.

For authentication, the Xiaomi smartphone uses a 3D ultrasonic fingerprint sensor integrated into the display, which reliably recognises registered fingerprints. Biometric face recognition is also available, though only via a relatively insecure 2D face unlock function.

Subpixel structure
Subpixel structure

The 6.73-inch display on the 15S Pro supports a 120 Hz refresh rate and offers a sharp 1440p resolution. Thanks to LTPO technology, the Xiaomi phone can reduce the refresh rate down to 1 Hz to conserve power.

In our tests, the panel reached a peak brightness of 3,142 cd/m² using the realistic APL18 pattern, coming very close to the advertised maximum of 3,200 nits.

As with typical OLED displays, Xiaomi uses PWM to control brightness. The device operates at a high PWM frequency of 1,920 Hz, as per the manufacturer. However, we observed baseline flickering at approximately 90 Hz. Oscilloscope measurements indicated consistent amplitude across the entire brightness range.

955
cd/m²
976
cd/m²
962
cd/m²
964
cd/m²
983
cd/m²
951
cd/m²
946
cd/m²
910
cd/m²
894
cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 983 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 949 cd/m² Minimum: 1.4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 993 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.07 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.83
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
99.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.233

Xiaomi 15S Pro
3200×1440, 6.7″
Xiaomi 15 Pro
AMOLED, 3200×1440, 6.7″
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120×1440, 6.7″
Oppo Find X8 Pro
AMOLED, 2780×1264, 6.8″
Google Pixel 9 Pro
OLED, 2856×1280, 6.3″
Screen

23%

20%

39%

69%

Brightness middle

983

1016

3%

1371

39%

1167

19%

2083

112%

Brightness

949

1017

7%

1370

44%

1160

22%

2016

112%

Brightness Distribution

91

98

8%

96

5%

98

8%

84

-8%

Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *

2.07

1.15

44%

2.7

-30%

0.87

58%

0.7

66%

Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *

5.24

3.57

32%

4.2

20%

1.64

69%

2

62%

Greyscale dE 2000 *

3.3

1.9

42%

2

39%

1.4

58%

1.1

67%

Gamma

2.233 99%

2.2 100%

2.03 108%

2.311 95%

2.22 99%

CCT

7224 90%

6677 97%

6450 101%

6426 101%

6560 99%

* … smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession – a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected 91.4 Hz
Amplitude: 38 %

The display backlight flickers at 91.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 91.4 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8356 (minimum: 5 – maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Measurement series with fixed zoom level and different brightness settings (The amplitude curve at minimum brightness looks flat, but this is due to the scaling. The info box shows the enlarged version of the amplitude at minimum brightness.)

The range of display settings is impressively extensive. In addition to various colour profiles, users can also adjust the colour temperature and fine-tune individual parameters. In the “Original Pro” profile, colour deviations are barely noticeable.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

       Response Time Black to White
18.6 ms … rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined ↗ 1.2 ms rise
↘ 17.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
6.3 ms … rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined ↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 1.3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms).

Outdoors, the 15S Pro leaves a strong impression. Even under direct sunlight, display content remains clearly visible. Viewing angle stability is also excellent, with no cause for criticism.

The XRing O1 chip is manufactured using a 3 nm process and reaches clock speeds of up to 3.9 GHz. In Geekbench, the Xiaomi CPU performs at a similar level to the Snapdragon 8 Elite found in the Pro model, although the Xiaomi 15 Pro still holds a slight advantage.

Graphics processing is handled by an integrated Immortalis G925 with 16 cores, which shows strong results in GPU benchmarks and does not need to shy away from the competition. While the 15S Pro does not outperform a Galaxy S25 Ultra in demanding GFXBench tests, it still achieves 50 FPS at 4K resolution.

Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


3136 Points +5%

Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


3089 Points +3%

Xiaomi 15S Pro
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384


2985 Points

Average Xiaomi Xring O1
  (2718 – 2985, n=2)





2852 Points -4%

Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384


2605 Points -13%

Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384


1971 Points -34%

Average of class Smartphone
  (196 – 3479, n=212, last 2 years)





1592 Points -47%

Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


10029 Points +8%

Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


9404 Points +2%

Xiaomi 15S Pro
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384


9250 Points

Average Xiaomi Xring O1
  (9097 – 9250, n=2)





9174 Points -1%

Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384


7480 Points -19%

Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384


4820 Points -48%

Average of class Smartphone
  (830 – 10401, n=212, last 2 years)





4579 Points -50%

Antutu v10 – Total Score
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


2611586 Points +5%

Average Xiaomi Xring O1
  (2487133 – 2599957, n=2)





2543545 Points +2%

Xiaomi 15S Pro
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384


2487133 Points

Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384


2374537 Points -5%

Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


2271821 Points -9%

Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 – 3015111, n=146, last 2 years)





1340846 Points -46%

Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384


1139380 Points -54%

PCMark for Android – Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


20673 Points +34%

Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


18231 Points +18%

Average Xiaomi Xring O1
  (15446 – 16503, n=2)





15975 Points +3%

Xiaomi 15S Pro
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384


15446 Points

Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 – 27169, n=199, last 2 years)





14209 Points -8%

Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384


12314 Points -20%

Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384


11823 Points -23%

CrossMark – Overall
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


2674 Points +17%

Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


2309 Points +1%

Xiaomi 15S Pro
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384


2276 Points

Average Xiaomi Xring O1
  (2155 – 2276, n=2)





2216 Points -3%

Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384


1145 Points -50%

Average of class Smartphone
  (187 – 2674, n=154, last 2 years)





1027 Points -55%

Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384


1021 Points -55%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


13223 Points +10%

Xiaomi 15S Pro
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384


11988 Points

Average Xiaomi Xring O1
  (11376 – 11988, n=2)





11682 Points -3%

Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384


10697 Points -11%

Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


9067 Points -24%

Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384


7716 Points -36%

Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 – 14066, n=159, last 2 years)





6989 Points -42%

System
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


17481 Points +11%

Xiaomi 15S Pro
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384


15799 Points

Average Xiaomi Xring O1
  (15399 – 15799, n=2)





15599 Points -1%

Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


14976 Points -5%

Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384


12891 Points -18%

Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 – 20776, n=159, last 2 years)





10814 Points -32%

Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384


8029 Points -49%

Memory
Xiaomi 15S Pro
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384


20652 Points

Average Xiaomi Xring O1
  (17036 – 20652, n=2)





18844 Points -9%

Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


16264 Points -21%

Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384


10197 Points -51%

Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384


9432 Points -54%

Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


7873 Points -62%

Average of class Smartphone
  (962 – 20652, n=159, last 2 years)





7832 Points -62%

Graphics
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384


56004 Points +97%

Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


45691 Points +61%

Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


44154 Points +55%

Xiaomi 15S Pro
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384


28402 Points

Average Xiaomi Xring O1
  (28099 – 28402, n=2)





28251 Points -1%

Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384


23041 Points -19%

Average of class Smartphone
  (1046 – 384996, n=159, last 2 years)





22381 Points -21%

Web
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


2353 Points +5%

Average Xiaomi Xring O1
  (2232 – 2273, n=2)





2253 Points +1%

Xiaomi 15S Pro
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384


2232 Points

Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384


1923 Points -14%

Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384


1879 Points -16%

Average of class Smartphone
  (858 – 2363, n=159, last 2 years)





1630 Points -27%

Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


1278 Points -43%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android – Overall Score NNAPI
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384


75143 Points +256%

Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384


36578 Points +73%

Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


23141 Points +10%

Average Xiaomi Xring O1
  (21087 – 23087, n=2)





22087 Points +5%

Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


21254 Points +1%

Xiaomi 15S Pro
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384


21087 Points

Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 – 81594, n=150, last 2 years)





18558 Points -12%

AImark – Score v3.x
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384


51509 Points +2499%

Average of class Smartphone
  (82 – 307528, n=134, last 2 years)





27654 Points +1295%

Average Xiaomi Xring O1
  (1982 – 2087, n=2)





2035 Points +3%

Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


1987 Points 0%

Xiaomi 15S Pro
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384


1982 Points

Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


1891 Points -5%

Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384


1146 Points -42%

AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Smartphone
  (46.4 – 3334, n=38, last 2 years)





972 Points

Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


245 Points

Score V6
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384


10739 Points +1508%

Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


10534 Points +1477%

Average of class Smartphone
  (68.9 – 12578, n=54, last 2 years)





4386 Points +557%

Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384


1112 Points +66%

Xiaomi 15S Pro
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384


668 Points

Average Xiaomi Xring O1
  (611 – 668, n=2)





640 Points -4%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


6885 Points +9%

Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash


6521 Points +4%

Xiaomi 15S Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


6294 Points

Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


5383 Points -14%

Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


2605 Points -59%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


7029 Points +11%

Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash


6567 Points +4%

Xiaomi 15S Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


6311 Points

Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


6303 Points 0%

Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


2547 Points -60%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
Xiaomi 15S Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


12400 Points +29%

Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash


11654 Points +21%

Xiaomi 15S Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


9604 Points

Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


9461 Points -1%

Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


Points -100%

3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


12747 Points +33%

Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash


11589 Points +21%

Xiaomi 15S Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


9594 Points

Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


9553 Points 0%

Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


Points -100%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash


2602 Points +6%

Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


2525 Points +3%

Xiaomi 15S Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


2458 Points

Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


1998 Points -19%

Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


1026 Points -58%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


2698 Points +10%

Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash


2576 Points +5%

Xiaomi 15S Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


2443 Points

Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


2054 Points -16%

Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


1001 Points -59%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


120 fps 0%

Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash


120 fps 0%

Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


120 fps 0%

Xiaomi 15S Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


120 fps

Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


60 fps -50%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 15S Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


818 fps

Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash


763 fps -7%

Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


744 fps -9%

Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


697 fps -15%

Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


415 fps -49%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash


120 fps 0%

Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


120 fps 0%

Xiaomi 15S Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


120 fps

Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


119 fps -1%

Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


64 fps -47%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


469 fps +26%

Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


450 fps +21%

Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash


423 fps +14%

Xiaomi 15S Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


371 fps

Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


245 fps -34%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash


120 fps 0%

Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


120 fps 0%

Xiaomi 15S Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


120 fps

Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


104 fps -13%

Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


60 fps -50%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


341 fps +14%

Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash


308 fps +3%

Xiaomi 15S Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


299 fps

Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


283 fps -5%

Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


165 fps -45%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash


120 fps 0%

Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


120 fps 0%

Xiaomi 15S Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


120 fps

Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


60 fps -50%

Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


54 fps -55%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash


209 fps +15%

Xiaomi 15S Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


182 fps

Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


178 fps -2%

Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


172 fps -5%

Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


85 fps -53%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


120 fps +26%

Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash


106 fps +12%

Xiaomi 15S Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


95 fps

Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


60 fps -37%

Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


47 fps -51%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash


112 fps +8%

Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


107 fps +3%

Xiaomi 15S Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


104 fps

Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


98 fps -6%

Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


44 fps -58%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash


120 fps 0%

Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


120 fps 0%

Xiaomi 15S Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


120 fps

Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


77 fps -36%

Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


60 fps -50%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


286 fps +12%

Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash


276 fps +8%

Xiaomi 15S Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


255 fps

Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


247 fps -3%

Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


119 fps -53%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


52 fps +4%

Xiaomi 15S Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


50 fps

Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash


48 fps -4%

Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


41 fps -18%

Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


20 fps -60%

Speedometer 3.0 – Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)


29 runs/min +100%

Xiaomi 15 Pro (Chrome 132)


28.9 runs/min +99%

Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)


16.3 runs/min +12%

Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)


15.8 runs/min +9%

Average Xiaomi Xring O1 (14.5 – 16.9, n=2)





15.7 runs/min +8%

Xiaomi 15S Pro


14.5 runs/min

Average of class Smartphone (1.03 – 34, n=103, last 2 years)





12.8 runs/min -12%

WebXPRT 4 – Overall
Xiaomi 15 Pro (Chrome 132)


255 Points +30%

Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)


239 Points +22%

Average Xiaomi Xring O1 (196 – 198, n=2)





197 Points +1%

Xiaomi 15S Pro (Chrome 137)


196 Points

Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)


147 Points -25%

Average of class Smartphone (22 – 273, n=157, last 2 years)





130.8 Points -33%

Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)


106 Points -46%

Octane V2 – Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)


98817 Points +22%

Xiaomi 15 Pro (Chrome 132)


84676 Points +4%

Average Xiaomi Xring O1 (81076 – 81322, n=2)





81199 Points 0%

Xiaomi 15S Pro


81076 Points

Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)


60987 Points -25%

Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)


60566 Points -25%

Average of class Smartphone (2228 – 100368, n=211, last 2 years)





44064 Points -46%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 – Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 – 28190, n=166, last 2 years)





1324 ms * -164%

Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)


699 ms * -39%

Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)


625.4 ms * -24%

Average Xiaomi Xring O1 (502 – 551, n=2)





527 ms * -5%

Xiaomi 15S Pro (Chromne 137)


502.34 ms *

Xiaomi 15 Pro (Chrome 132)


423.11 ms * +16%

Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)


388.7 ms * +23%

* … smaller is better

Xiaomi 15S Pro Xiaomi 15 Pro Samsung Galaxy S25+ Oppo Find X8 Pro Google Pixel 9 Pro Average 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5

-4%

-20%

-27%

-64%

-11%

-45%

Sequential Read 256KB

3786.34

3998.65

6%

4057.35

7%

3482.9

-8%

1717.9

-55%

3917 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(3754 – 4110, n=5)

3%

2109 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(270 – 4384, n=194, last 2 years)

-44%

Sequential Write 256KB

3649.81

3673.38

1%

3311.02

-9%

3498.5

-4%

253.53

-93%

3582 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(3464 – 3761, n=5)

-2%

1712 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(103.2 – 4030, n=194, last 2 years)

-53%

Random Read 4KB

422.84

409.67

-3%

294.51

-30%

375.7

-11%

218.41

-48%

356 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(311 – 423, n=5)

-16%

291 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(47.6 – 504, n=194, last 2 years)

-31%

Random Write 4KB

677.95

555.55

-18%

351.16

-48%

100.4

-85%

261.55

-61%

476 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(379 – 678, n=5)

-30%

334 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(9.4 – 964, n=194, last 2 years)

-51%

0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip

Surface temperatures are relatively high. However, in the 3DMark Wild Life stress tests, the 15S Pro shows only a moderate performance drop of around 10 to 15 percent.

  46.1 °C
115 F
46.2 °C
115 F
42.8 °C
109 F
 
  47.6 °C
118 F
45.3 °C
114 F
43.3 °C
110 F
 
  48.2 °C
119 F
46.6 °C
116 F
43 °C
109 F
 
Maximum: 48.2 °C = 119 F
Average: 45.5 °C = 114 F
40.3 °C
105 F
44.5 °C
112 F
44.5 °C
112 F
41.2 °C
106 F
43.9 °C
111 F
45 °C
113 F
42.3 °C
108 F
44.7 °C
112 F
45.7 °C
114 F
Maximum: 45.7 °C = 114 F
Average: 43.6 °C = 110 F

Power Supply (max.)  42.3 °C = 108 F | Room Temperature 21 °C = 70 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 45.5 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.2 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.7 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


92.3 % +3%

Xiaomi 15S Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


89.8 %

Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash


75.3 % -16%

Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


67.6 % -25%

Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


53.4 % -41%

Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi 15S Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


86.4 %

Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash


75.8 % -12%

Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


69.3 % -20%

Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


58 % -33%

Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


51.3 % -41%

Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 15S Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


87.4 %

Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash


83.8 % -4%

Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


58.9 % -33%

Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


55.5 % -36%

Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 15S Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


84.3 %

Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


77.3 % -8%

Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash


76.5 % -9%

Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


66.5 % -21%

Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


61 % -28%

0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip

Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø32.1 (31.1-36)

Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø28.8 (26.6-35)

Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø99.6 (96.9-107.9)

Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø103.5 (96.3-128)

Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø29.9 (28.8-32.9)

Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø29.4 (28.1-33.5)

Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø16.2 (15.8-18.8)

Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø15.2 (13.9-18.1)

The Xiaomi smartphone uses a dual-speaker setup that delivers impressive sound. Light bass is present, although the pink noise test reveals a somewhat uneven frequency response. For external audio output, users can connect via the USB port (wired) or use Bluetooth 5.4 (wireless).

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.836.12535.5363130.328.64037.229.25032.631.86318.221.98018.331.310021.141.412518.648.41601652.820016.256.225018.357.931517.859.740014.258.750014.963.163018.865.280020.369.2100016.872.8125014.877.516001780.120001479.9250012.676.731501270.6400011.872.550001266.1630012.167.380001271.41000012751250011.869.11600011.470.9SPL27.187N0.964.9median 14.8median 69.1Delta37.340.539.132.236.533.230.931.129.738.540.226.133.924.632.819.536.618.341.516.354.515.455.71455.715.158.213.263.111.568.811.868.713.472.915.27613.375.31371.112.771.513.971.814.277.11481.214.685.413.781.413.680.813.578.513.476.512.666.825.990.60.781.3median 13.7median 71.818.5hearing rangehide median Pink Noise

The 15S Pro uses a new battery generation that combines silicon and carbon at the anode. The 6,100 mAh battery supports fast charging via USB-C at 90 watts or wireless charging at 50 watts. In our test, charging took just about 55 minutes when using Boost mode.

The device demonstrates efficient power consumption both at idle and under load.

Xiaomi 15S Pro
6100 mAh
Xiaomi 15 Pro
6100 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S25+
4900 mAh
Oppo Find X8 Pro
5910 mAh
Google Pixel 9 Pro
4700 mAh
Average Xiaomi Xring O1
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption

17%

-22%

17%

-12%

-107%

-7%

Idle Minimum *

0.8

0.6

25%

0.45

44%

0.6

25%

0.59

26%

2.65 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(0.8 – 4.5, n=2)

-231%

0.87 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(0.4 – 1.65, n=162, last 2 years)

-9%

Idle Average *

1.4

0.9

36%

1.09

22%

0.8

43%

1.1

21%

3.1 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(1.4 – 4.8, n=2)

-121%

1.424 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(0.6 – 4.36, n=162, last 2 years)

-2%

Idle Maximum *

1.7

1.1

35%

1.13

34%

0.9

47%

1.2

29%

3.45 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(1.7 – 5.2, n=2)

-103%

1.581 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(0.85 – 4.46, n=162, last 2 years)

7%

Load Average *

6.3

6.7

-6%

14.41

-129%

6.8

-8%

7.15

-13%

9.1 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(6.3 – 11.9, n=2)

-44%

7.13 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(2.3 – 16.5, n=149, last 2 years)

-13%

Load Maximum *

9.1

9.5

-4%

16.37

-80%

10.9

-20%

20.37

-124%

12.4 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(9.1 – 15.7, n=2)

-36%

10.7 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(3.53 – 20.8, n=149, last 2 years)

-18%

* … smaller is better

0123456789Tooltip

Xiaomi 15S Pro Xiaomi Xring O1; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.3 (1.352-9.01)

Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.51 (0.64-9.38)

Xiaomi 15S Pro Xiaomi Xring O1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.922 (0.711-1.47)

Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.622 (0.528-0.962)

0123456789Tooltip

Xiaomi 15S Pro Xiaomi Xring O1; 1920×1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.92 (8.78-8.97)

Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; 1920×1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.37 (9.34-9.41)

Xiaomi 15S Pro Xiaomi Xring O1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.922 (0.711-1.47)

Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.622 (0.528-0.962)

In our Wi-Fi test at a calibrated display brightness of 150 cd/m², the 15S Pro lasts for over 25 hours, which represents an excellent runtime.

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 137) 25h 26min

The Xiaomi 15S Pro is an excellent smartphone, though it is unlikely to receive an official release in Europe.

Xiaomi 15S Pro
– 06/26/2025 v8

Marcus Herbrich

Connectivity

69 / 69 → 100%

Games Performance

52 / 55 → 95%

Application Performance

76 / 85 → 89%

Smartphone – Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
35%

Packaging
50%

Power Use
96%

Repairability
50%

Software Updates
60%

Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 48.5%

Image

Model / Review

Price

Weight

Drive

Display

1.

89.8%

Xiaomi 15S Pro

Xiaomi 15S Pro
Xiaomi Xring O1 ⎘
ARM Immortalis-G925 MC16 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $7.99
Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible …
2. $16.79
Bruni Screen Protector compa…
3. $10.32
HGJTFANY [4 Pcs Screen Prote…
List Price: 830€
216 g 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash 6.73″
3200×1440
521 PPI

2.

89.9%

Xiaomi 15 Pro

Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 1024 GB 
Amazon:
1. $2.49
Natbok 2 Pack 3D Compatible …
2. $8.88
Foebxxs [2 Pack Hydrogel Fle…
3. $8.99
Anbzsign (2+2 Pack for Xiaom…
List Price: 810€
213 g 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash 6.73″
3200×1440
521 PPI
AMOLED

3.

88.4%

Samsung Galaxy S25+

Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $16.99
Super Fast Charger Type C, 2…
2. $7.98
firtstnow 3 Pack Glass Scree…
3. $16.99
S25 S24 S23 S22 Ultra Samsun…
List Price: 1149 Euro
190 g 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash 6.70″
3120×1440
513 PPI
Dynamic AMOLED 2X

4.

87.3%

Oppo Find X8 Pro

Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400 ⎘
ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $15.99
AKABEILA [3 Pack Privacy Scr…
2. $7.27
GANGANPRO 2 Pack Privacy Scr…
3. $9.99
WRTBS Phone Case for Oppo Fi…
List Price: 1199€
215 g 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash 6.78″
2780×1264
450 PPI
AMOLED

5.

85.7%

Google Pixel 9 Pro

Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4 ⎘
ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 128 GB 
Amazon:
1. $999.00
Google Pixel 9 Pro – Unlocke…
2. $1,799.00
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold – Un…
3. $899.00
Google Pixel 9 – Unlocked An…
199 g 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash 6.30″
2856×1280
495 PPI
OLED

More articles related to this device

Xiaomi 15S Pro (15 Series)

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Marcus Herbrich, 2025-07- 1 (Update: 2025-07- 1)

Read More

Prev post
Next post

Leave A Reply

en_USEnglish